Talk:Professional wrestling
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Professional wrestling article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
The use of the contentious topics procedure has been authorised by the community for pages related to professional wrestling, including this page. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned. |
This level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
"Atheltic theatre"
[edit]In an earlier discussion, I accepted that the adjective "athletic" could apply to professional wrestling as a type of theatre if you stretch the definition a little, but do we really need that word there? It's fairly obvious, and little superfluous. Kurzon (talk) 05:45, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think it's superfluous – it illustrates why pro wrestling is different to regular, traditional theatre. The athleticism of pro wrestling is a vital part of the genre; the adjective (which is well sourced, mind) illustrates that.
- Respectfully, I think it's time to drop this. There was a lot discussion over this one word previously, and you've edit warred to remove it more recently. It's an accurate adjective – why does this one word vex you this much? I would not be the first person to mention WP:OWN. — Czello (music) 11:41, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Theatre in the traditional sense is not athletic. Wrestling being a heavily athletic form of theatre makes it unique in the world of theatre, and thus warrants the elaboration. You "accepting" something is grand, and certainly not the aim of anyone's editing. You do not own the article. Perhaps spend some time editing other articles rather than terrorizing the editors who contribute to this one -- as if your approval is needed in order to let an edit remain. It absolutely is not. Cheers! 4theloveofallthings (talk) 20:18, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Not a wrestling guy, but I think there might be an error in the article?
[edit]Under Countout: "In some promotions (and most major modern ones), Championships are depicted as being permitted to change hands via a countout, unless the on-screen authority declares it for at least one match, although in others, championships may change hands via countout."
To me, this reads like you're missing a "not" after "depicted as"? I don't know enough about wrestling to feel confident changing it, though. Vtipoman (talk) 18:01, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- You're completely right. I've fixed this but rewritten most of the paragraph to improve the language. — Czello (music) 07:02, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
"Pkiro Wrokestling" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]The redirect Pkiro Wrokestling has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 14 § Pkiro Wrokestling until a consensus is reached. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 18:29, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Incomplete history section
[edit]The history tab ends with the death of WCW. It should have made some mention, even a small one, of ECW given that they were the third national promotion at this time. It should also continue on to discuss the modern era of professional wrestling, especially the emergence of TNA and AEW 174.92.68.241 (talk) 18:23, 27 December 2024 (UTC)